Today, we’re re-reviewing the Core Ultra 9 285 K– simply joking! Instead, we’re throwing Intel’s latest front runner CPU to the wolves, and by that we imply we are comparing it head-to-head with the Ryzen 7 9800 X 3 D across 45 games.
What we need to know is how these CPUs contrast across a wide range of video games– or, more specifically, just how much faster the 9800 X 3 D is. For this evaluation, we’re sticking to the brand-new format. As opposed to revealing private outcomes for a lots or so titles and summing up the margins for the rest, we’ll present outcomes for 5 video games at once. By doing this, you can see the FPS information for each video game examined.
As always, all CPU pc gaming standards are conducted at 1080 p utilizing the GeForce RTX 4090 If you wonder why this is the most effective method for reviewing CPU performance in video games today and right into the future, we have a post for that right here.
Now, let’s study the charts!
Gaming Standards
The Last people, Cyberpunk, Hogwarts Tradition, ACC, Spider-Man
For our first batch of games, allow’s start with The Last of Us Part 1 This is an instance where the 285 K does rather well, leading to the 9800 X 3 D being only 5 % faster– a minimal margin. In this situation, both CPUs supply exceptional efficiency, as expected from front runner cpus.
Nevertheless, the 285 K stinks in Cyberpunk 2077, choking the RTX 4090 to just 151 fps. Because of this, the Ryzen 7 processor is an excellent 45 % faster. The 9800 X 3 D also squashes the 285 K in Hogwarts Heritage, providing 43 % far better efficiency. The margins are much more harsh in ACC, where the AMD processor exceeds the Intel CPU by a staggering 75 %. While efficiency enhances for Intel in Spider-Man Remastered, the 9800 X 3 D still keeps a 15 % lead.
Baldur’s Entrance 3, Homeworld 3, APTR, Trip Simulator, Starfield
Next off, we have Baldur’s Gateway 3, where the 9800 X 3 D is 34 % faster, jumping from 131 fps to 176 fps. The margins end up being a lot more striking in Homeworld 3, with the 9800 X 3 D attaining 58 % much better ordinary frame prices and an extraordinary 117 % renovation in 1 % lows.
The 285 K additionally carries out suddenly inadequately in A Plague Tale: Requiem, averaging just 123 fps compared to 195 fps on the 9800 X 3 D– a 59 % efficiency increase for the AMD CPU.
In Microsoft Trip Simulator 2020, the 9800 X 3 D maintains a strong lead with an average of 95 fps, a 34 % renovation over the 285 K. The Intel CPU reveals among its ideal lead to Starfield, though even here, the 9800 X 3 D is 10 % faster.
Horizon Forbidden West, Horizon Absolutely No Dawn, Watch Dogs, Far Cry 6, T&L
In Horizon Forbidden West, the 285 K supplies one of its finest efficiencies, coming within a few percent points of the 9800 X 3 D. Nevertheless, in Perspective No Dawn, the Ryzen 7 cpu is 29 % faster. The 9800 X 3 D additionally surpasses the 285 K by 46 % in Watch Dogs Legion and 28 % in Far Cry 6, while the margin is minimal in Throne and Freedom.
Hitman 3, Callisto Procedure, SoTR, Halo, Warhammer 3
Following is Hit man 3, where AMD’s 3 D V-Cache cpu is simply 7 % faster. Both CPUs give ample performance for this older game. We’ve updated the criteria for The Callisto Method to a much less GPU-bound test, revealing the 9800 X 3 D outperforming the 285 K by 42 %.
We’re also seeing a 24 % rise in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and like Hit man 3 performance here is much more than is required, yet it’s an excellent standard device for contrasting the video gaming efficiency of these two components. Then we see that performance in Halo Infinite and Warhammer III is near enough to be similar.
Black Ops 6, Borderlands 3, Riftbreaker, Remnant 2, SWJS
This next set of results starts with Black Ops 6, where the 9800 X 3 D is 19 % faster. Although the 285 K is more than capable in this instance, the Ryzen 7’s substantial benefit suggests far better longevity.
In a similar way, in Borderlands 3, the 9800 X 3 D supplies a 21 % renovation. In The Riftbreaker, the 285 K faces a substantial defeat, with the 3 D V-Cache processor is a whopping 42 % faster.
In Remnant 2, the 285 K produces reasonably low frame prices for a high-end CPU, making the 30 % enhancement supplied by the 9800 X 3 D extremely obvious, especially for those utilizing high refresh price screens. Lastly, in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, the 9800 X 3 D delivers a squashing 45 % efficiency lead.
War Thunder, Skull and Bones, Returnal, Cog & & Clank, Dying Light 2
And right here we have yet more gaming data. Those looking for ultimate efficiency in Battle Thunder will locate the 285 K underwhelming, as 266 fps is not specifically remarkable in this title. This additionally suggests the 9800 X 3 D was nearly 50 % faster.
Efficiency in Skull and Bones, Returnal, and Ratchet & & Clank is nearly the same, without clear winner. Nevertheless, the 9800 X 3 D supplies a 19 % performance uplift in Perishing Light 2
Forza Horizon 5, Forza Motorsport, Gears 5, Ghost of Tsushima, Quest
The 9800 X 3 D is just slightly faster in Forza Horizon 5, but it shows a 21 % enhancement in Forza Motorsport. In Gears 5, the Core Ultra 9 cpu is entirely outmatched, handling simply 180 fps with 1 % lows of 101 fps. This causes the 9800 X 3 D being 62 % faster. Margins are much more modest in Ghost of Tsushima and Hunt: Showdown, though the 9800 X 3 D is pleasantly in advance in both cases.
World War Z, F 1 24, Rainbow 6 Siege, Counter-Strike 2, Fortnite
The 285 K is once again smashed, with the 9800 X 3 D delivering a 27 % lead in Globe Battle Z and an 18 % benefit in F 1 24 Similar gains are observed in Rainbow Six Siege, where the Ryzen 7 processor offers 26 % higher efficiency, and in Counter-Strike 2, where it provides a 30 % renovation.
In Fortnite, we encountered a compatibility concern with Easy Anti-Cheat, which avoided the game from working on the 285 K. We reported the problem to Intel over a week back, and they have educated us that they are dealing with Legendary Gamings on a repair. With any luck, this will be resolved soon.
Assassin’s Creed x 2, Space Marine 2, SW Outlaws, Dragon Age: The Veilguard
Lastly, we get to the last collection of results, beginning with Assassin’s Creed Mirage, where the 9800 X 3 D leads by a comfy 22 %, pushing framework rates beyond 200 fps. In Valhalla, the 9800 X 3 D reveals just a 5 % enhancement in ordinary structure rates yet an excellent 64 % advantage in 1 % lows, based upon a three-run average.
Space Marine 2 is heavily CPU-limited, making the 27 % efficiency boost from the 9800 X 3 D a substantial benefit, particularly for those using high-refresh-rate displays. In A Similar Way, Celebrity Wars Outlaws is CPU-intensive, yet here, the 9800 X 3 D is simply 5 % faster. Last but not least, in Dragon Age: The Veilguard, the 9800 X 3 D keeps a 15 % lead.
45 Video game Average
Right here’s exactly how the Ryzen 7 9800 X 3 D and Core Ultra 9 285 K contrast head-to-head across the 45 games examined. There are no circumstances where the Ryzen processor was slower. Margins within 5 % are considered a tie, as distinctions of 1– 3 % are not statistically substantial.
Across the 45 games, we discovered the 9800 X 3 D to be, usually, 24 % faster. While this margin is smaller than our testimonial information, that’s because testimonials commonly emphasize CPU-limited video gaming. This dataset consists of a number of GPU-limited titles, such as Forza Perspective 5
What’s especially bothering for the 285 K is the variety of video games where the Ryzen CPU led by over 40 %. Ideally, this is something Intel can address, but it appears the 285 K might merely not be ideal for players.
When taking a look at the 1 % lows, the tale remains mostly the same. The 9800 X 3 D provides, on average, 29 % much better 1 % lows. While there are remarkable double-digit gains across numerous titles, the total averages and 1 % lows repaint a constant picture.
What We Found out
To say this was a prejudiced slamming, with AMD possessing the 3 D V-Cache hammer, would be specifying the obvious. Intel’s 285 K obtained annihilated. You might assume that’s a bit over the top, nevertheless the 285 K provided flawlessly acceptable gaming efficiency in the majority of titles tested, however we are discussing Intel’s latest high-end CPU, and at $ 630, it is far from affordable.
Provided, the Core Ultra 285 K is a better performance CPU. However, that’s not the competitors the 9800 X 3 D was developed for– it’s developed for video gaming. As it stands, the 9800 X 3 D is the very best pc gaming CPU offered, with the previous-generation Ryzen 7 7800 X 3 D being available in as the next best.
Even worse still for the 285 K, the Ryzen 9 9950 X 3 D is expected early next year. It will likely declare the efficiency crown from Intel’s 285 K. Even now, it’s unclear whether the 285 K holds that title, as the 9950 X already surpasses it in several performance workloads.
Returning to gaming, if you’re seeking the absolute finest in CPU efficiency, Intel is no more part of the discussion, which is surprising. The 9800 X 3 D is just also fast. Intel has actually confessed that Arrow Lake fizzled and assured efficiency fixes by December, yet expectations stay unclear.
Intel’s Robert Hallock has actually publicly acknowledged that certain BIOS and OS-level settings have created concerns that adversely impacted efficiency. It’s likely that Windows scheduling renovations will certainly support efficiency throughout a more comprehensive variety of games. Compatibility troubles, such as those with Easy Anti-Cheat, likewise require to be fixed. We understand Intel’s statements concerning Arrowhead Lake’s performance, if they manage to get out some updates before year’s end, you can rest assured we’ll re-test whatever you have actually seen right here.
